Lake Tyler Master Plan

Share Lake Tyler Master Plan on Facebook Share Lake Tyler Master Plan on Twitter Share Lake Tyler Master Plan on Linkedin Email Lake Tyler Master Plan link

The Lake Tyler Master Plan is now available for review.

About the Project

Lake Tyler and Lake Tyler East are treasured resources for our community, providing clean drinking water, recreation, and natural beauty. The City of Tyler is updating the Lake Tyler and Lake Tyler East Master Plan to ensure these lakes continue to meet the needs of residents today and tomorrow.

The plan will guide future decisions about sustainable development, recreation, and water quality protection. With input from lake users, property owners, and stakeholders, the Master Plan will outline clear strategies to balance environmental stewardship with opportunities for enjoyment and growth around the lakes.

Key priorities include:

  • Protecting and improving water quality

  • Supporting a variety of recreation and visitor experiences

  • Preserving the natural environment while planning for future development

This project is built on community voices and shared responsibility, helping shape the future of two of East Texas’s most important destinations.

Boathouse and Plumbing Inspections

As part of protecting Lake Tyler and Lake Tyler East, Tyler Water Utilities is organizing inspections of boathouses and plumbing fixtures. These checks help keep the lakes safe, comply with environmental regulations, and preserve water quality for everyone.

  • Inspections ensure plumbing fixtures meet City Code requirements.

  • The first inspection is free if everything is in compliance.

  • If corrections are needed, property owners will have time to make improvements.

These inspections are one more way we are working together to keep Lake Tyler and Lake Tyler East clean, safe, and enjoyable.

Scroll below to ask a question about the Lake Tyler Master Plan or the Boathouse and Plumbing Inspections.

The Lake Tyler Master Plan is now available for review.

About the Project

Lake Tyler and Lake Tyler East are treasured resources for our community, providing clean drinking water, recreation, and natural beauty. The City of Tyler is updating the Lake Tyler and Lake Tyler East Master Plan to ensure these lakes continue to meet the needs of residents today and tomorrow.

The plan will guide future decisions about sustainable development, recreation, and water quality protection. With input from lake users, property owners, and stakeholders, the Master Plan will outline clear strategies to balance environmental stewardship with opportunities for enjoyment and growth around the lakes.

Key priorities include:

  • Protecting and improving water quality

  • Supporting a variety of recreation and visitor experiences

  • Preserving the natural environment while planning for future development

This project is built on community voices and shared responsibility, helping shape the future of two of East Texas’s most important destinations.

Boathouse and Plumbing Inspections

As part of protecting Lake Tyler and Lake Tyler East, Tyler Water Utilities is organizing inspections of boathouses and plumbing fixtures. These checks help keep the lakes safe, comply with environmental regulations, and preserve water quality for everyone.

  • Inspections ensure plumbing fixtures meet City Code requirements.

  • The first inspection is free if everything is in compliance.

  • If corrections are needed, property owners will have time to make improvements.

These inspections are one more way we are working together to keep Lake Tyler and Lake Tyler East clean, safe, and enjoyable.

Scroll below to ask a question about the Lake Tyler Master Plan or the Boathouse and Plumbing Inspections.

Ask a Question

Do you have questions about the Lake Tyler Master Plan? Ask them here to get a response from a project team member.

Email
loader image
Forgot password?
Didn't receive confirmation?
Register Now
Seems like you are already registered, please provide the password. Forgot your password? Create a new one now.
  • Share Shoreline erosion was listed as a topic that needs to be addressed. I am an avid fisherman and spend hours on the lake. First and foremost, the lake is for everybody to enjoy including kayaking, skiing, and fishing. In the past 4-5 years, I have seen the erosion become worst in many parts of the lake. The largest culprit are the large wakeboard boats that are leaving a trail of massive waves. These large waves are eating up the shoreline and you visibly see this as the waves pound the earth and leave the banks muddy looking. Lake Tyler is not large enough to accommodate so many of these large watercraft. They need to be restricted to certain areas of the lake in my opinion. I hear boat docks make noises as these massive waves pound against the support pilings. I had to help an elderly man that had his small boat get capsized by Langley Island last year. Fortunately, he was in shallow water and he was okay but lost some of his gear. Wakeboard boats are simply bad for “smaller-sized lakes”. There is factual evidence that states that the erosion, roto-tilling of the lake’s bottom, and damage to personal property creates too many issues on smaller lakes. This has led to some lakes banning them or having restricted areas for them to navigate. Again, the lake is for everybody to enjoy and I hope somebody will look into the issue. on Facebook Share Shoreline erosion was listed as a topic that needs to be addressed. I am an avid fisherman and spend hours on the lake. First and foremost, the lake is for everybody to enjoy including kayaking, skiing, and fishing. In the past 4-5 years, I have seen the erosion become worst in many parts of the lake. The largest culprit are the large wakeboard boats that are leaving a trail of massive waves. These large waves are eating up the shoreline and you visibly see this as the waves pound the earth and leave the banks muddy looking. Lake Tyler is not large enough to accommodate so many of these large watercraft. They need to be restricted to certain areas of the lake in my opinion. I hear boat docks make noises as these massive waves pound against the support pilings. I had to help an elderly man that had his small boat get capsized by Langley Island last year. Fortunately, he was in shallow water and he was okay but lost some of his gear. Wakeboard boats are simply bad for “smaller-sized lakes”. There is factual evidence that states that the erosion, roto-tilling of the lake’s bottom, and damage to personal property creates too many issues on smaller lakes. This has led to some lakes banning them or having restricted areas for them to navigate. Again, the lake is for everybody to enjoy and I hope somebody will look into the issue. on Twitter Share Shoreline erosion was listed as a topic that needs to be addressed. I am an avid fisherman and spend hours on the lake. First and foremost, the lake is for everybody to enjoy including kayaking, skiing, and fishing. In the past 4-5 years, I have seen the erosion become worst in many parts of the lake. The largest culprit are the large wakeboard boats that are leaving a trail of massive waves. These large waves are eating up the shoreline and you visibly see this as the waves pound the earth and leave the banks muddy looking. Lake Tyler is not large enough to accommodate so many of these large watercraft. They need to be restricted to certain areas of the lake in my opinion. I hear boat docks make noises as these massive waves pound against the support pilings. I had to help an elderly man that had his small boat get capsized by Langley Island last year. Fortunately, he was in shallow water and he was okay but lost some of his gear. Wakeboard boats are simply bad for “smaller-sized lakes”. There is factual evidence that states that the erosion, roto-tilling of the lake’s bottom, and damage to personal property creates too many issues on smaller lakes. This has led to some lakes banning them or having restricted areas for them to navigate. Again, the lake is for everybody to enjoy and I hope somebody will look into the issue. on Linkedin Email Shoreline erosion was listed as a topic that needs to be addressed. I am an avid fisherman and spend hours on the lake. First and foremost, the lake is for everybody to enjoy including kayaking, skiing, and fishing. In the past 4-5 years, I have seen the erosion become worst in many parts of the lake. The largest culprit are the large wakeboard boats that are leaving a trail of massive waves. These large waves are eating up the shoreline and you visibly see this as the waves pound the earth and leave the banks muddy looking. Lake Tyler is not large enough to accommodate so many of these large watercraft. They need to be restricted to certain areas of the lake in my opinion. I hear boat docks make noises as these massive waves pound against the support pilings. I had to help an elderly man that had his small boat get capsized by Langley Island last year. Fortunately, he was in shallow water and he was okay but lost some of his gear. Wakeboard boats are simply bad for “smaller-sized lakes”. There is factual evidence that states that the erosion, roto-tilling of the lake’s bottom, and damage to personal property creates too many issues on smaller lakes. This has led to some lakes banning them or having restricted areas for them to navigate. Again, the lake is for everybody to enjoy and I hope somebody will look into the issue. link

    Shoreline erosion was listed as a topic that needs to be addressed. I am an avid fisherman and spend hours on the lake. First and foremost, the lake is for everybody to enjoy including kayaking, skiing, and fishing. In the past 4-5 years, I have seen the erosion become worst in many parts of the lake. The largest culprit are the large wakeboard boats that are leaving a trail of massive waves. These large waves are eating up the shoreline and you visibly see this as the waves pound the earth and leave the banks muddy looking. Lake Tyler is not large enough to accommodate so many of these large watercraft. They need to be restricted to certain areas of the lake in my opinion. I hear boat docks make noises as these massive waves pound against the support pilings. I had to help an elderly man that had his small boat get capsized by Langley Island last year. Fortunately, he was in shallow water and he was okay but lost some of his gear. Wakeboard boats are simply bad for “smaller-sized lakes”. There is factual evidence that states that the erosion, roto-tilling of the lake’s bottom, and damage to personal property creates too many issues on smaller lakes. This has led to some lakes banning them or having restricted areas for them to navigate. Again, the lake is for everybody to enjoy and I hope somebody will look into the issue.

    Joseph asked 4 days ago
    Thank you for taking the time to share your experiences and concerns regarding shoreline erosion on Lake Tyler. 
    We understand that increased wave action, particularly from larger wakeboard boats, can contribute to shoreline erosion and impact docks, personal property, and overall lake enjoyment. Your observations about wave activity, bank conditions, and safety concerns are important. These issues were identified and addressed as part of the Lake Tyler Master Plan.
    Our team is currently evaluating the data collected from the study, along with potential management strategies to balance recreation, shoreline protection, and safety for all lake users.
    Thank you again for your thoughtful contribution and for your stewardship of Lake Tyler.
  • Share Hill Creek Boat Ramp Project - I wonder how the city cannot put public bathrooms at boat ramps and camping areas at the top of any lists for grants or projects at or on Lake Tyler. Talking about water quality at the Lake and increasing tourist traffic are opposing goals without providing toilet facilities. Toilet facilities and patrols should be provided BEFORE becoming a destination lake and spending advertising dollars. Additional tourists and boat traffic create more problems with trash, feces, and erosion from boat wakes. ANY improvements to the lake or funding requests should start with bathrooms and patrols. on Facebook Share Hill Creek Boat Ramp Project - I wonder how the city cannot put public bathrooms at boat ramps and camping areas at the top of any lists for grants or projects at or on Lake Tyler. Talking about water quality at the Lake and increasing tourist traffic are opposing goals without providing toilet facilities. Toilet facilities and patrols should be provided BEFORE becoming a destination lake and spending advertising dollars. Additional tourists and boat traffic create more problems with trash, feces, and erosion from boat wakes. ANY improvements to the lake or funding requests should start with bathrooms and patrols. on Twitter Share Hill Creek Boat Ramp Project - I wonder how the city cannot put public bathrooms at boat ramps and camping areas at the top of any lists for grants or projects at or on Lake Tyler. Talking about water quality at the Lake and increasing tourist traffic are opposing goals without providing toilet facilities. Toilet facilities and patrols should be provided BEFORE becoming a destination lake and spending advertising dollars. Additional tourists and boat traffic create more problems with trash, feces, and erosion from boat wakes. ANY improvements to the lake or funding requests should start with bathrooms and patrols. on Linkedin Email Hill Creek Boat Ramp Project - I wonder how the city cannot put public bathrooms at boat ramps and camping areas at the top of any lists for grants or projects at or on Lake Tyler. Talking about water quality at the Lake and increasing tourist traffic are opposing goals without providing toilet facilities. Toilet facilities and patrols should be provided BEFORE becoming a destination lake and spending advertising dollars. Additional tourists and boat traffic create more problems with trash, feces, and erosion from boat wakes. ANY improvements to the lake or funding requests should start with bathrooms and patrols. link

    Hill Creek Boat Ramp Project - I wonder how the city cannot put public bathrooms at boat ramps and camping areas at the top of any lists for grants or projects at or on Lake Tyler. Talking about water quality at the Lake and increasing tourist traffic are opposing goals without providing toilet facilities. Toilet facilities and patrols should be provided BEFORE becoming a destination lake and spending advertising dollars. Additional tourists and boat traffic create more problems with trash, feces, and erosion from boat wakes. ANY improvements to the lake or funding requests should start with bathrooms and patrols.

    JoeC asked about 1 month ago

    The City is currently pursuing a Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) Boating Access Grant to rehabilitate the Hill Creek boat ramp. 

    While the grant may also fund supporting amenities, such as public restrooms or short walking trails, the boat ramp itself must remain the primary focus of the project to be eligible for funding. The City can only apply for one boat ramp grant at a time. Advancement of this project depends on the City’s successful award of TPWD grant funds. 

    To learn more about TPWD's Boating Access Grant, visit Boating Access Grants — Texas Parks & Wildlife Department.

  • Share Representation How does the City justify making major policy decisions for lake residents who cannot vote for City Council? What formal mechanism exists (or will exist) for lake residents to have binding input, not just advisory feedback? Water Utility Revenue What is the annual revenue generated by Tyler Water Utilities from Lake Tyler as a public water supply? How much of that revenue is reinvested directly into lake protection, enforcement, monitoring, and infrastructure? Why is this revenue not clearly disclosed and discussed in the Master Plan? Tourism Justification If Lake Tyler is a critical drinking water source, why is tourism expansion being prioritized at all? What data shows that increased recreational use improves water quality rather than degrades it? Resident Impact Analysis Where in the plan is a formal analysis of impacts to shoreline homeowners? How will increased traffic, wakes, and usage be mitigated to protect private property and safety? Boathouse and Shoreline Policies How were shoreline residents involved in discussions about boathouse regulations? Will existing residents bear additional costs or restrictions as tourism increases? on Facebook Share Representation How does the City justify making major policy decisions for lake residents who cannot vote for City Council? What formal mechanism exists (or will exist) for lake residents to have binding input, not just advisory feedback? Water Utility Revenue What is the annual revenue generated by Tyler Water Utilities from Lake Tyler as a public water supply? How much of that revenue is reinvested directly into lake protection, enforcement, monitoring, and infrastructure? Why is this revenue not clearly disclosed and discussed in the Master Plan? Tourism Justification If Lake Tyler is a critical drinking water source, why is tourism expansion being prioritized at all? What data shows that increased recreational use improves water quality rather than degrades it? Resident Impact Analysis Where in the plan is a formal analysis of impacts to shoreline homeowners? How will increased traffic, wakes, and usage be mitigated to protect private property and safety? Boathouse and Shoreline Policies How were shoreline residents involved in discussions about boathouse regulations? Will existing residents bear additional costs or restrictions as tourism increases? on Twitter Share Representation How does the City justify making major policy decisions for lake residents who cannot vote for City Council? What formal mechanism exists (or will exist) for lake residents to have binding input, not just advisory feedback? Water Utility Revenue What is the annual revenue generated by Tyler Water Utilities from Lake Tyler as a public water supply? How much of that revenue is reinvested directly into lake protection, enforcement, monitoring, and infrastructure? Why is this revenue not clearly disclosed and discussed in the Master Plan? Tourism Justification If Lake Tyler is a critical drinking water source, why is tourism expansion being prioritized at all? What data shows that increased recreational use improves water quality rather than degrades it? Resident Impact Analysis Where in the plan is a formal analysis of impacts to shoreline homeowners? How will increased traffic, wakes, and usage be mitigated to protect private property and safety? Boathouse and Shoreline Policies How were shoreline residents involved in discussions about boathouse regulations? Will existing residents bear additional costs or restrictions as tourism increases? on Linkedin Email Representation How does the City justify making major policy decisions for lake residents who cannot vote for City Council? What formal mechanism exists (or will exist) for lake residents to have binding input, not just advisory feedback? Water Utility Revenue What is the annual revenue generated by Tyler Water Utilities from Lake Tyler as a public water supply? How much of that revenue is reinvested directly into lake protection, enforcement, monitoring, and infrastructure? Why is this revenue not clearly disclosed and discussed in the Master Plan? Tourism Justification If Lake Tyler is a critical drinking water source, why is tourism expansion being prioritized at all? What data shows that increased recreational use improves water quality rather than degrades it? Resident Impact Analysis Where in the plan is a formal analysis of impacts to shoreline homeowners? How will increased traffic, wakes, and usage be mitigated to protect private property and safety? Boathouse and Shoreline Policies How were shoreline residents involved in discussions about boathouse regulations? Will existing residents bear additional costs or restrictions as tourism increases? link

    Representation How does the City justify making major policy decisions for lake residents who cannot vote for City Council? What formal mechanism exists (or will exist) for lake residents to have binding input, not just advisory feedback? Water Utility Revenue What is the annual revenue generated by Tyler Water Utilities from Lake Tyler as a public water supply? How much of that revenue is reinvested directly into lake protection, enforcement, monitoring, and infrastructure? Why is this revenue not clearly disclosed and discussed in the Master Plan? Tourism Justification If Lake Tyler is a critical drinking water source, why is tourism expansion being prioritized at all? What data shows that increased recreational use improves water quality rather than degrades it? Resident Impact Analysis Where in the plan is a formal analysis of impacts to shoreline homeowners? How will increased traffic, wakes, and usage be mitigated to protect private property and safety? Boathouse and Shoreline Policies How were shoreline residents involved in discussions about boathouse regulations? Will existing residents bear additional costs or restrictions as tourism increases?

    Fishingmom asked about 1 month ago

    Thank you for sharing your feedback and questions regarding the Lake Tyler Master Plan. We truly value lake residents’ engagement and appreciate the opportunity to clarify the plan’s intent and approach.

    Representation

    While City Council governs based on its jurisdiction, lake residents’ perspectives are essential to decisions affecting Lake Tyler. The master planning process has included opportunities for input through public meetings, stakeholder conversations, and written feedback. We will continue to strengthen these engagement channels and welcome your ongoing participation.

    Water Utility Revenue & Budget Scope

    The Master Plan is scoped to Lake Tyler management, including water quality protection, shoreline stewardship, lake safety, recreation, and lake-related infrastructure. It does not include the entire Tyler Water Utilities budget, which covers citywide treatment, distribution, regulatory compliance, and system-wide operations that extend well beyond the lake. Instead, the plan focuses on transparency where it matters most: summarizing Lake Tyler–specific investments and priorities, and identifying fair, long-term funding strategies tied directly to lake protection and management.

    For a broader view of the full range of infrastructure Tyler Water Utilities oversees and the long-term capital and operational needs across the system, you can review the Drinking Water and Wastewater Master Plans available on the City’s website at:
    -Drinking Water
    -Wastewater

    On the idea of reinvesting all revenue from water treated from Lake Tyler back into Lake Tyler

    We understand the desire to see strong investment in the lake. At the same time, revenues from water treatment support the entire utility system that delivers safe, reliable drinking water across the service area. Those funds must cover treatment and distribution networks, maintenance of pipelines and plants, regulatory compliance obligations, and emergency preparedness for system-wide contingencies. If all revenues associated with Lake Tyler were reinvested exclusively in the lake, critical system needs elsewhere would be underfunded, ultimately risking reliability and compliance citywide. The plan promotes a balanced approach: dedicate resources to Lake Tyler’s specific needs while maintaining the health of the broader water system, so the lake and the community it serves remain sustainable.

    Tourism and Recreation

    Water quality protection is the plan’s top priority. Any recreational or access enhancements must include safeguards, monitoring, and enforcement to prevent degradation of the drinking water source.

    Resident Impacts

    We recognize concerns about traffic, wakes, and safety. The plan calls for measures to improve enforcement, promote safe water operations, and protect shorelines. These tools will continue to be refined in partnership with residents and stakeholders.

    Boathouse and Shoreline Policies

    We value the investments leaseholders have made along the shoreline. Any policy changes will be communicated clearly and applied fairly, with the aim of minimizing burdens while ensuring consistent, effective stewardship of the lakes.

    Thank you again for your commitment to Lake Tyler’s future.

  • Share Since the primary objective of the LTMP is to provide for the protection, preservation and enhancement of Tyler’s crown jewel - Lake Tyler East and West - I’m surprised of a glaring deficiency in the formation of the LTMP that could have a significant impact upon the City’s primary water supply. The City of Tyler and the LTMP seem to emphasize the ramping up of the regulation of boathouse plumbing fixtures (fair enough), but completely sidesteps without mention the implications of the 25 year old high pressure gas lines (6 according to RRC maps) that traverse underneath the waters of Lake Tyler East. Does the City of Tyler and its City Council blithely assume that these underwater high pressure lines pose no threat whatsoever when it comes to water quality of the lakes? Is the Tyler City Council even aware that they exist? I spoke yesterday (1/14/25) to Tyler Councilwoman Petra Hawkins. She was extremely nice, helpful and accommodating in listening to my concerns on this matter. She also admitted she had no prior knowledge of these pipelines and that as a City Councilwoman that the issue had not been discussed with her. But that she would share this newly found information with other City officials. I thanked her for that. But all this leads to these unanswered questions: (1) Has the City of Tyler and its Council considered that there could be a major threat to water quality and Lake environs if one (or more) of these high pressure gas lines traversing underwater Lake Tyler East were to burst or to be compromised in any way? (2) If so, does the City of Tyler have a contingency plan if such an event were to happen? (3) If there is no contingency plan, should one be formulated as a part of the creation of the LTMP? Because the bursting of possible multiple high pressure gas lines running underneath Lake Tyler East waters poses a much more formidable threat to all that is Lake Tyler East and West than does a broken boathouse plumbing fixture. And should be given at least as much attention to in the ratification of the LTMP….IMHO. I appreciate the opportunity to convey my concerns. Please advise. Thank you. on Facebook Share Since the primary objective of the LTMP is to provide for the protection, preservation and enhancement of Tyler’s crown jewel - Lake Tyler East and West - I’m surprised of a glaring deficiency in the formation of the LTMP that could have a significant impact upon the City’s primary water supply. The City of Tyler and the LTMP seem to emphasize the ramping up of the regulation of boathouse plumbing fixtures (fair enough), but completely sidesteps without mention the implications of the 25 year old high pressure gas lines (6 according to RRC maps) that traverse underneath the waters of Lake Tyler East. Does the City of Tyler and its City Council blithely assume that these underwater high pressure lines pose no threat whatsoever when it comes to water quality of the lakes? Is the Tyler City Council even aware that they exist? I spoke yesterday (1/14/25) to Tyler Councilwoman Petra Hawkins. She was extremely nice, helpful and accommodating in listening to my concerns on this matter. She also admitted she had no prior knowledge of these pipelines and that as a City Councilwoman that the issue had not been discussed with her. But that she would share this newly found information with other City officials. I thanked her for that. But all this leads to these unanswered questions: (1) Has the City of Tyler and its Council considered that there could be a major threat to water quality and Lake environs if one (or more) of these high pressure gas lines traversing underwater Lake Tyler East were to burst or to be compromised in any way? (2) If so, does the City of Tyler have a contingency plan if such an event were to happen? (3) If there is no contingency plan, should one be formulated as a part of the creation of the LTMP? Because the bursting of possible multiple high pressure gas lines running underneath Lake Tyler East waters poses a much more formidable threat to all that is Lake Tyler East and West than does a broken boathouse plumbing fixture. And should be given at least as much attention to in the ratification of the LTMP….IMHO. I appreciate the opportunity to convey my concerns. Please advise. Thank you. on Twitter Share Since the primary objective of the LTMP is to provide for the protection, preservation and enhancement of Tyler’s crown jewel - Lake Tyler East and West - I’m surprised of a glaring deficiency in the formation of the LTMP that could have a significant impact upon the City’s primary water supply. The City of Tyler and the LTMP seem to emphasize the ramping up of the regulation of boathouse plumbing fixtures (fair enough), but completely sidesteps without mention the implications of the 25 year old high pressure gas lines (6 according to RRC maps) that traverse underneath the waters of Lake Tyler East. Does the City of Tyler and its City Council blithely assume that these underwater high pressure lines pose no threat whatsoever when it comes to water quality of the lakes? Is the Tyler City Council even aware that they exist? I spoke yesterday (1/14/25) to Tyler Councilwoman Petra Hawkins. She was extremely nice, helpful and accommodating in listening to my concerns on this matter. She also admitted she had no prior knowledge of these pipelines and that as a City Councilwoman that the issue had not been discussed with her. But that she would share this newly found information with other City officials. I thanked her for that. But all this leads to these unanswered questions: (1) Has the City of Tyler and its Council considered that there could be a major threat to water quality and Lake environs if one (or more) of these high pressure gas lines traversing underwater Lake Tyler East were to burst or to be compromised in any way? (2) If so, does the City of Tyler have a contingency plan if such an event were to happen? (3) If there is no contingency plan, should one be formulated as a part of the creation of the LTMP? Because the bursting of possible multiple high pressure gas lines running underneath Lake Tyler East waters poses a much more formidable threat to all that is Lake Tyler East and West than does a broken boathouse plumbing fixture. And should be given at least as much attention to in the ratification of the LTMP….IMHO. I appreciate the opportunity to convey my concerns. Please advise. Thank you. on Linkedin Email Since the primary objective of the LTMP is to provide for the protection, preservation and enhancement of Tyler’s crown jewel - Lake Tyler East and West - I’m surprised of a glaring deficiency in the formation of the LTMP that could have a significant impact upon the City’s primary water supply. The City of Tyler and the LTMP seem to emphasize the ramping up of the regulation of boathouse plumbing fixtures (fair enough), but completely sidesteps without mention the implications of the 25 year old high pressure gas lines (6 according to RRC maps) that traverse underneath the waters of Lake Tyler East. Does the City of Tyler and its City Council blithely assume that these underwater high pressure lines pose no threat whatsoever when it comes to water quality of the lakes? Is the Tyler City Council even aware that they exist? I spoke yesterday (1/14/25) to Tyler Councilwoman Petra Hawkins. She was extremely nice, helpful and accommodating in listening to my concerns on this matter. She also admitted she had no prior knowledge of these pipelines and that as a City Councilwoman that the issue had not been discussed with her. But that she would share this newly found information with other City officials. I thanked her for that. But all this leads to these unanswered questions: (1) Has the City of Tyler and its Council considered that there could be a major threat to water quality and Lake environs if one (or more) of these high pressure gas lines traversing underwater Lake Tyler East were to burst or to be compromised in any way? (2) If so, does the City of Tyler have a contingency plan if such an event were to happen? (3) If there is no contingency plan, should one be formulated as a part of the creation of the LTMP? Because the bursting of possible multiple high pressure gas lines running underneath Lake Tyler East waters poses a much more formidable threat to all that is Lake Tyler East and West than does a broken boathouse plumbing fixture. And should be given at least as much attention to in the ratification of the LTMP….IMHO. I appreciate the opportunity to convey my concerns. Please advise. Thank you. link

    Since the primary objective of the LTMP is to provide for the protection, preservation and enhancement of Tyler’s crown jewel - Lake Tyler East and West - I’m surprised of a glaring deficiency in the formation of the LTMP that could have a significant impact upon the City’s primary water supply. The City of Tyler and the LTMP seem to emphasize the ramping up of the regulation of boathouse plumbing fixtures (fair enough), but completely sidesteps without mention the implications of the 25 year old high pressure gas lines (6 according to RRC maps) that traverse underneath the waters of Lake Tyler East. Does the City of Tyler and its City Council blithely assume that these underwater high pressure lines pose no threat whatsoever when it comes to water quality of the lakes? Is the Tyler City Council even aware that they exist? I spoke yesterday (1/14/25) to Tyler Councilwoman Petra Hawkins. She was extremely nice, helpful and accommodating in listening to my concerns on this matter. She also admitted she had no prior knowledge of these pipelines and that as a City Councilwoman that the issue had not been discussed with her. But that she would share this newly found information with other City officials. I thanked her for that. But all this leads to these unanswered questions: (1) Has the City of Tyler and its Council considered that there could be a major threat to water quality and Lake environs if one (or more) of these high pressure gas lines traversing underwater Lake Tyler East were to burst or to be compromised in any way? (2) If so, does the City of Tyler have a contingency plan if such an event were to happen? (3) If there is no contingency plan, should one be formulated as a part of the creation of the LTMP? Because the bursting of possible multiple high pressure gas lines running underneath Lake Tyler East waters poses a much more formidable threat to all that is Lake Tyler East and West than does a broken boathouse plumbing fixture. And should be given at least as much attention to in the ratification of the LTMP….IMHO. I appreciate the opportunity to convey my concerns. Please advise. Thank you.

    Markflynn asked about 2 months ago

    Thank you for taking the time to share your concerns regarding the presence of high-pressure gas lines beneath Lake Tyler East. We appreciate your thoughtful engagement in the Lake Tyler Master Plan process and your focus on protecting the City’s primary drinking water source.

    The natural gas lines referenced in your comments are owned, operated, and maintained by private oil and gas companies. Regulatory oversight, including inspection, integrity management, and maintenance requirements, falls under the jurisdiction of the Texas Railroad Commission. The City of Tyler does not have legal authority to oversee, regulate, or perform maintenance on these private utility lines. 

    These pipelines are designed and constructed with protective encasements and are extremely deep. In the event of a line failure, the encasement is intended to contain the conveyed material and reduce the potential for direct release into the surrounding environment.

    While the City does not regulate these facilities, their presence has been noted in the Lake Tyler Master Plan. The Master Plan will include language stating that the City will further evaluate what, if any, legal responsibilities or coordination roles it may have regarding these lines, particularly with respect to emergency response coordination and interagency communication.

    Thank you again for your engagement and for taking the time to raise these important questions.

  • Share In reviewing the master plan for Lake Tyler—specifically the Hill Creek Boat Ramp project—I noted that restrooms are listed as “pending available funding.” I am requesting clarification as to why this critical infrastructure item is not prioritized ahead of amenities such as trail access to the boat ramp, picnic nodes, signage, and courtesy docks. At present, there are no restroom facilities available at public parks or boat ramps around Lake Tyler. In the absence of restrooms, visitors are left without any appropriate option for waste disposal, which predictably results in improper use in or near the lake. This directly conflicts with the City’s stated emphasis on water quality protection and environmental stewardship. Given these circumstances, it is difficult to reconcile why restroom facilities would be deferred while nonessential amenities move forward. From both a public health and environmental protection perspective, allocating existing funding to restroom facilities first would appear to be the more responsible and effective use of resources. I would appreciate understanding the rationale behind this prioritization and whether reconsideration is being given to elevating restrooms to a primary funding priority within the project. on Facebook Share In reviewing the master plan for Lake Tyler—specifically the Hill Creek Boat Ramp project—I noted that restrooms are listed as “pending available funding.” I am requesting clarification as to why this critical infrastructure item is not prioritized ahead of amenities such as trail access to the boat ramp, picnic nodes, signage, and courtesy docks. At present, there are no restroom facilities available at public parks or boat ramps around Lake Tyler. In the absence of restrooms, visitors are left without any appropriate option for waste disposal, which predictably results in improper use in or near the lake. This directly conflicts with the City’s stated emphasis on water quality protection and environmental stewardship. Given these circumstances, it is difficult to reconcile why restroom facilities would be deferred while nonessential amenities move forward. From both a public health and environmental protection perspective, allocating existing funding to restroom facilities first would appear to be the more responsible and effective use of resources. I would appreciate understanding the rationale behind this prioritization and whether reconsideration is being given to elevating restrooms to a primary funding priority within the project. on Twitter Share In reviewing the master plan for Lake Tyler—specifically the Hill Creek Boat Ramp project—I noted that restrooms are listed as “pending available funding.” I am requesting clarification as to why this critical infrastructure item is not prioritized ahead of amenities such as trail access to the boat ramp, picnic nodes, signage, and courtesy docks. At present, there are no restroom facilities available at public parks or boat ramps around Lake Tyler. In the absence of restrooms, visitors are left without any appropriate option for waste disposal, which predictably results in improper use in or near the lake. This directly conflicts with the City’s stated emphasis on water quality protection and environmental stewardship. Given these circumstances, it is difficult to reconcile why restroom facilities would be deferred while nonessential amenities move forward. From both a public health and environmental protection perspective, allocating existing funding to restroom facilities first would appear to be the more responsible and effective use of resources. I would appreciate understanding the rationale behind this prioritization and whether reconsideration is being given to elevating restrooms to a primary funding priority within the project. on Linkedin Email In reviewing the master plan for Lake Tyler—specifically the Hill Creek Boat Ramp project—I noted that restrooms are listed as “pending available funding.” I am requesting clarification as to why this critical infrastructure item is not prioritized ahead of amenities such as trail access to the boat ramp, picnic nodes, signage, and courtesy docks. At present, there are no restroom facilities available at public parks or boat ramps around Lake Tyler. In the absence of restrooms, visitors are left without any appropriate option for waste disposal, which predictably results in improper use in or near the lake. This directly conflicts with the City’s stated emphasis on water quality protection and environmental stewardship. Given these circumstances, it is difficult to reconcile why restroom facilities would be deferred while nonessential amenities move forward. From both a public health and environmental protection perspective, allocating existing funding to restroom facilities first would appear to be the more responsible and effective use of resources. I would appreciate understanding the rationale behind this prioritization and whether reconsideration is being given to elevating restrooms to a primary funding priority within the project. link

    In reviewing the master plan for Lake Tyler—specifically the Hill Creek Boat Ramp project—I noted that restrooms are listed as “pending available funding.” I am requesting clarification as to why this critical infrastructure item is not prioritized ahead of amenities such as trail access to the boat ramp, picnic nodes, signage, and courtesy docks. At present, there are no restroom facilities available at public parks or boat ramps around Lake Tyler. In the absence of restrooms, visitors are left without any appropriate option for waste disposal, which predictably results in improper use in or near the lake. This directly conflicts with the City’s stated emphasis on water quality protection and environmental stewardship. Given these circumstances, it is difficult to reconcile why restroom facilities would be deferred while nonessential amenities move forward. From both a public health and environmental protection perspective, allocating existing funding to restroom facilities first would appear to be the more responsible and effective use of resources. I would appreciate understanding the rationale behind this prioritization and whether reconsideration is being given to elevating restrooms to a primary funding priority within the project.

    Natalie asked about 1 month ago

    Thank you for this question. Tyler Water Utilities is currently pursuing a grant from the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) to rehabilitate the Hill Creek boat ramp. While the grant may also fund supporting amenities, such as public restrooms or short walking trails, the boat ramp itself must remain the primary focus of the project to be eligible for funding. The City can only apply for one boat ramp grant at a time. Advancement of this project is contingent upon the City’s successful award of TPWD grant funds.

  • Share When will the revised draft - with the input that has been received through January 16th be available for review? Will a mark-up copy be available showing the draft as of 1/14/26 as compared with the final, so we know what feedback was included and what was changed based on our feedback. on Facebook Share When will the revised draft - with the input that has been received through January 16th be available for review? Will a mark-up copy be available showing the draft as of 1/14/26 as compared with the final, so we know what feedback was included and what was changed based on our feedback. on Twitter Share When will the revised draft - with the input that has been received through January 16th be available for review? Will a mark-up copy be available showing the draft as of 1/14/26 as compared with the final, so we know what feedback was included and what was changed based on our feedback. on Linkedin Email When will the revised draft - with the input that has been received through January 16th be available for review? Will a mark-up copy be available showing the draft as of 1/14/26 as compared with the final, so we know what feedback was included and what was changed based on our feedback. link

    When will the revised draft - with the input that has been received through January 16th be available for review? Will a mark-up copy be available showing the draft as of 1/14/26 as compared with the final, so we know what feedback was included and what was changed based on our feedback.

    Gayle asked about 2 months ago

    Thank you for your question. The final Lake Tyler Master Plan is scheduled to be available to the public on February 25, following City Council approval. At this time, a revised draft will not be released prior to Council action, and a marked-up or redline version comparing earlier drafts to the final document will not be provided. However, all public input received through January 16 will be carefully reviewed and considered as part of the plan refinement process. Where appropriate, feedback will be incorporated into the final plan. The adopted Master Plan will reflect the outcome of this process.

  • Share If a boathouse has potable water and installs a filter to take out all chemicals, would that be granted by the city ? Also if a boat house was granted potable water 35 years ago, would it be grandfathered? on Facebook Share If a boathouse has potable water and installs a filter to take out all chemicals, would that be granted by the city ? Also if a boat house was granted potable water 35 years ago, would it be grandfathered? on Twitter Share If a boathouse has potable water and installs a filter to take out all chemicals, would that be granted by the city ? Also if a boat house was granted potable water 35 years ago, would it be grandfathered? on Linkedin Email If a boathouse has potable water and installs a filter to take out all chemicals, would that be granted by the city ? Also if a boat house was granted potable water 35 years ago, would it be grandfathered? link

    If a boathouse has potable water and installs a filter to take out all chemicals, would that be granted by the city ? Also if a boat house was granted potable water 35 years ago, would it be grandfathered?

    Billy asked about 1 month ago

    Thank you for your question.

    Under the City of Tyler ordinance and the TCEQ variance, boathouses with plumbing are limited to a single restroom on Lake Tyler. Specifically, City of Tyler Code of Ordinances, Sec. 19-206(c)(2) states: “Only one commode, one bathroom lavatory, one shower and/or tub, one kitchen sink (double compartment), one water heater, and one ice-maker/ice dispensing unit is allowed per boathouse.”

    Boathouses that currently have plumbing and meet the ordinance requirements, including the one-commode limitation, are considered compliant and may continue to operate under those conditions. However, if a boathouse does not meet the specified criteria, it must be brought into compliance. New boathouses, or existing boathouses undergoing substantial or extensive renovations, are not permitted to install any plumbing.

    If a resident has a filtration system that removes chlorine and any added minerals, they will still need to comply with the same inspection standards, as wastewater is conveyed above the water. The only exception in this scenario is the presence of a hose bib for washing docks/boats. If the water is not chlorinated and no additional minerals are added, it is not considered a contaminant and can be used to wash docks/boats.

  • Share I am looking at purchasing a piece of property on lake Tyler that has plumbing in the boathouse. There are actually two toilets on this boathouse. I am wondering if with these boathouse inspections a case would arise when I have to remove one of the bathrooms, even if everything is in good working order. Are you going to retroactively try to enforce the new code of no plumbing in a boathouse? on Facebook Share I am looking at purchasing a piece of property on lake Tyler that has plumbing in the boathouse. There are actually two toilets on this boathouse. I am wondering if with these boathouse inspections a case would arise when I have to remove one of the bathrooms, even if everything is in good working order. Are you going to retroactively try to enforce the new code of no plumbing in a boathouse? on Twitter Share I am looking at purchasing a piece of property on lake Tyler that has plumbing in the boathouse. There are actually two toilets on this boathouse. I am wondering if with these boathouse inspections a case would arise when I have to remove one of the bathrooms, even if everything is in good working order. Are you going to retroactively try to enforce the new code of no plumbing in a boathouse? on Linkedin Email I am looking at purchasing a piece of property on lake Tyler that has plumbing in the boathouse. There are actually two toilets on this boathouse. I am wondering if with these boathouse inspections a case would arise when I have to remove one of the bathrooms, even if everything is in good working order. Are you going to retroactively try to enforce the new code of no plumbing in a boathouse? link

    I am looking at purchasing a piece of property on lake Tyler that has plumbing in the boathouse. There are actually two toilets on this boathouse. I am wondering if with these boathouse inspections a case would arise when I have to remove one of the bathrooms, even if everything is in good working order. Are you going to retroactively try to enforce the new code of no plumbing in a boathouse?

    Clay Luttrell asked about 1 month ago

    Thank you for your inquiry regarding the boathouse plumbing regulations on Lake Tyler.

    Under the City of Tyler ordinance and the TCEQ variance, boathouses with plumbing are limited to a single restroom on Lake Tyler. Specifically, City of Tyler Code of Ordinances, Sec. 19-206(c)(2) states: “Only one commode, one bathroom lavatory, one shower and/or tub, one kitchen sink (double compartment), one water heater, and one ice-maker/ice dispensing unit is allowed per boathouse.”

    If the property currently has two bathrooms in the boathouse, one of the restrooms would need to be permanently plugged and taken out of service to bring the structure into compliance with this section of the ordinance and the conditions of the TCEQ variance. 

    Boathouses that currently have plumbing and meet the ordinance requirements, including the one-commode limitation, are considered compliant and may continue to operate under those conditions. However, if a boathouse does not meet the specified criteria, it must be brought into compliance. New boathouses, or existing boathouses undergoing substantial or extensive renovations, are not permitted to install any plumbing.

  • Share I am interested in the numbers the mayor mentioned on the total fees from the lake leases and the amount for road repairs. I remember roughly: 180,000 in fees 280,000 in road maintenance costs. The implication made was lake tyler lease holder's should pay for all road maintenance. But they did not mention money from the sales tax, gas tax, vehicle registration, monies we pay for that goes toward road maintenance Or the portion of our county tax that goes for roads. Or the portion the city should pay for visitors to the city parks, boat ramps, concessions. And why don't they let the county maintain the roads. Why can't the city charge a building fee to cover road damage by new construction? Dirt trucks, concrete trucks, building material trucks all do major damage. A concrete truck weighs 60,000 to 90,000 pounds. They do more damage than a 3,000 to 4,000 pound car. What percentage of cars on lake roads are residents? What percentage are visitors? Why would the city expect residents to pay for all road cost? What percentage should the city pay for road maintenance for visitors and non residents? on Facebook Share I am interested in the numbers the mayor mentioned on the total fees from the lake leases and the amount for road repairs. I remember roughly: 180,000 in fees 280,000 in road maintenance costs. The implication made was lake tyler lease holder's should pay for all road maintenance. But they did not mention money from the sales tax, gas tax, vehicle registration, monies we pay for that goes toward road maintenance Or the portion of our county tax that goes for roads. Or the portion the city should pay for visitors to the city parks, boat ramps, concessions. And why don't they let the county maintain the roads. Why can't the city charge a building fee to cover road damage by new construction? Dirt trucks, concrete trucks, building material trucks all do major damage. A concrete truck weighs 60,000 to 90,000 pounds. They do more damage than a 3,000 to 4,000 pound car. What percentage of cars on lake roads are residents? What percentage are visitors? Why would the city expect residents to pay for all road cost? What percentage should the city pay for road maintenance for visitors and non residents? on Twitter Share I am interested in the numbers the mayor mentioned on the total fees from the lake leases and the amount for road repairs. I remember roughly: 180,000 in fees 280,000 in road maintenance costs. The implication made was lake tyler lease holder's should pay for all road maintenance. But they did not mention money from the sales tax, gas tax, vehicle registration, monies we pay for that goes toward road maintenance Or the portion of our county tax that goes for roads. Or the portion the city should pay for visitors to the city parks, boat ramps, concessions. And why don't they let the county maintain the roads. Why can't the city charge a building fee to cover road damage by new construction? Dirt trucks, concrete trucks, building material trucks all do major damage. A concrete truck weighs 60,000 to 90,000 pounds. They do more damage than a 3,000 to 4,000 pound car. What percentage of cars on lake roads are residents? What percentage are visitors? Why would the city expect residents to pay for all road cost? What percentage should the city pay for road maintenance for visitors and non residents? on Linkedin Email I am interested in the numbers the mayor mentioned on the total fees from the lake leases and the amount for road repairs. I remember roughly: 180,000 in fees 280,000 in road maintenance costs. The implication made was lake tyler lease holder's should pay for all road maintenance. But they did not mention money from the sales tax, gas tax, vehicle registration, monies we pay for that goes toward road maintenance Or the portion of our county tax that goes for roads. Or the portion the city should pay for visitors to the city parks, boat ramps, concessions. And why don't they let the county maintain the roads. Why can't the city charge a building fee to cover road damage by new construction? Dirt trucks, concrete trucks, building material trucks all do major damage. A concrete truck weighs 60,000 to 90,000 pounds. They do more damage than a 3,000 to 4,000 pound car. What percentage of cars on lake roads are residents? What percentage are visitors? Why would the city expect residents to pay for all road cost? What percentage should the city pay for road maintenance for visitors and non residents? link

    I am interested in the numbers the mayor mentioned on the total fees from the lake leases and the amount for road repairs. I remember roughly: 180,000 in fees 280,000 in road maintenance costs. The implication made was lake tyler lease holder's should pay for all road maintenance. But they did not mention money from the sales tax, gas tax, vehicle registration, monies we pay for that goes toward road maintenance Or the portion of our county tax that goes for roads. Or the portion the city should pay for visitors to the city parks, boat ramps, concessions. And why don't they let the county maintain the roads. Why can't the city charge a building fee to cover road damage by new construction? Dirt trucks, concrete trucks, building material trucks all do major damage. A concrete truck weighs 60,000 to 90,000 pounds. They do more damage than a 3,000 to 4,000 pound car. What percentage of cars on lake roads are residents? What percentage are visitors? Why would the city expect residents to pay for all road cost? What percentage should the city pay for road maintenance for visitors and non residents?

    BC asked about 2 months ago

    Thank you for this question. We appreciate the opportunity to clarify the numbers that were mentioned and the intent behind that discussion during the City Council Meeting. 

    The figures referenced by the Mayor were meant to illustrate the overall gap between revenue generated at Lake Tyler and the cost to maintain City infrastructure and services in the area, not to suggest that leaseholders should be responsible for all roadway or operational costs.

    To provide additional detail, the City maintains approximately 21.85 miles of roadway around Lake Tyler. Using a conservative resurfacing cycle of 20 years, an average road width of 20 feet, and a low estimate of $2 per square foot, the average annual cost for roadway maintenance alone is approximately $230,000. This figure does not include drainage issues, culvert replacements, potholes, or sinkhole repairs, which can significantly increase costs in certain years.

    By comparison, total annual revenue generated from Lake Tyler lease fees is approximately $147,900, which contributes toward, but does not fully cover, road maintenance costs. The City also recognizes that not all traffic on Lake Tyler roads comes from lessees. The discussion around lease revenue and roadway expenses was intended to provide transparency and context, not to assign sole responsibility to lessees.

    Roads are only one component of the City’s responsibility at Lake Tyler. The City also funds recreation areas and facility maintenance, staffing, utilities, equipment, fuel, water system protection, vegetation management, erosion control, environmental compliance, insurance, law enforcement patrols during peak and holiday weekends, and long-term replacement of aging infrastructure. These are ongoing obligations tied to Lake Tyler’s role as both a public water supply and a recreational asset.

    You also raised important points about other funding sources, such as sales tax, gas tax, and vehicle registration fees. Because Lake Tyler lessees live outside City limits, those revenues are not generated by Lake Tyler residents and are not paid to the City by lessees. While those funding sources do support transportation needs within Tyler, they are collected from City residents and visitors and allocated citywide across many streets, neighborhoods, and projects. Additionally, those 21.85 miles of Lake Tyler roads fall under City ownership and jurisdiction, which limits the County’s ability to assume maintenance responsibility.

    We appreciate your engagement. 

  • Share A few questions: When will the boathouse inspections start, how will the property owners be notified, and how will those be scheduled for owner availability? Will there be be different consideration for those that have deep private wells which do not have chlorinated water? Will there be provisions for boathouse reconstruction with plumbing if there is significant damage due to fire or weather? on Facebook Share A few questions: When will the boathouse inspections start, how will the property owners be notified, and how will those be scheduled for owner availability? Will there be be different consideration for those that have deep private wells which do not have chlorinated water? Will there be provisions for boathouse reconstruction with plumbing if there is significant damage due to fire or weather? on Twitter Share A few questions: When will the boathouse inspections start, how will the property owners be notified, and how will those be scheduled for owner availability? Will there be be different consideration for those that have deep private wells which do not have chlorinated water? Will there be provisions for boathouse reconstruction with plumbing if there is significant damage due to fire or weather? on Linkedin Email A few questions: When will the boathouse inspections start, how will the property owners be notified, and how will those be scheduled for owner availability? Will there be be different consideration for those that have deep private wells which do not have chlorinated water? Will there be provisions for boathouse reconstruction with plumbing if there is significant damage due to fire or weather? link

    A few questions: When will the boathouse inspections start, how will the property owners be notified, and how will those be scheduled for owner availability? Will there be be different consideration for those that have deep private wells which do not have chlorinated water? Will there be provisions for boathouse reconstruction with plumbing if there is significant damage due to fire or weather?

    Ted asked about 1 month ago

    Plumbing inspections for boathouses are scheduled to begin in March. In February, you’ll receive a letter letting you know if your boathouse was identified as having plumbing during the City’s inventory. This letter will also include the inspection checklist that the plumber will use, so you know what to expect. Starting in late February, the contractor will contact you to schedule your inspection. The plumber will work with you directly to find a time that works for you, based on their availability. Please note that the City won’t be handling the scheduling of inspections.

    If you use a well and have plumbing in your boathouse, you’ll need to follow the same inspection standards, since wastewater is discharged above the water. The only exception is for a hose bib used to wash off docks or boats. If your well water isn’t chlorinated and doesn’t have any extra minerals added, it’s not considered a contaminant.

    If your boathouse needs repairs because of severe weather or fire damage, it will need to go through the same permitting process as any other remodel. Keep in mind that plumbing isn’t allowed as part of the rehabilitation process.

Page last updated: 19 Feb 2026, 07:12 PM